For Australian medical students and junior doctors
Interview and exam preparation for competitive medical training here — specialty by specialty, university by university. Three question banks are in build. Nothing is on sale yet.
Written from the Australian source material — college selection policies, published criteria and the formats each state and network actually runs. Read first, then written.
Pre-launch
Tell us which assessment you are sitting. You will get new guides as we publish them, and an email when that bank opens.
Most of what is available was built for UK deaneries or US residency. The clinical medicine overlaps. Almost nothing around it does.
Preparing on imported material means practising the wrong structure, against the wrong criteria, for a panel that is not the one you will sit in front of.
Selection sits with the Australian specialty colleges. Each sets its own criteria, its own weightings and its own application timeline. A UK deanery process or a US match tells you very little about either.
A multiple mini interview run in one state is not the panel a hospital network runs in another. The format decides what a strong answer looks like — its length, its structure, and what you are expected to volunteer without being asked.
Clinical guidance, referral pathways and medico-legal framing are local. An answer reasoned from NHS practice reads as imported, because it is.
All three are in build. Pricing has not been set, so nothing on this page is for sale.
Doctors applying for specialty training
Interview banks for selection into specialty training — RACS SET, RACP Basic Training, and the college and jurisdiction processes that sit alongside them. Station by station, with the scoring domains named before the model answer.
The gap we started with. There is no serious Australia-specific option for this.
How selection works by specialty
Students in the earlier years of an Australian MD
Questions mapped to your medical school and your year, across roughly 20 Australian programmes. Written against the assessment you actually sit, not a national average of what a second year ought to know.
Get notified
Trainees sitting written and clinical college exams
Banks built to the structure of the paper — the RACP Divisional Written and Divisional Clinical examinations, and the equivalent written and clinical stages at the other colleges.
Get notifiedYou already know the medicine. What costs marks is not knowing what the format rewards — and finding that out in the room.
Assessment
Stations are scored against domains, not impressions. Every question names what is being tested, so you practise against the criteria rather than the topic. If a station is measuring how you handle competing priorities, it says so.
Standard
Model answers are annotated. You see the structure that earns the marks, the point at which an average answer stops, and the reasoning that carries the rest of it.
Volume
Banks are sized for repetition, not a single read-through. Targeted to your specialty, or to your university and your year group.
Locality
Scenarios, guidelines and terminology are Australian. Where a format differs by state or by hospital network, the material names which one it is describing.
The Australian specialty interview landscape is fragmented. Formats vary between states, between hospital networks, and sometimes between intakes at the same hospital. There is not always a single national standard to prepare against — and any provider telling you otherwise is describing a certainty they do not have either.
So we mark it. Every piece of material carries one of three labels, and the label is set by what we could actually verify — not by what would make the bank look more complete.
Preparation built on a guess is worse than none, because you cannot tell which part of it to distrust.
How the material is labelled
The starting point is the source material: college selection policies, published scoring criteria, the structure of each written and clinical examination, and how each state and training network actually runs its process.
That research runs continuously alongside the writing, because the pathway moves. Selection into clinical radiology changed in Victoria in 2025. Material written against last year’s process is already answering a different question.
Where a college publishes its criteria, we work from the criteria and say where they came from. Where the format varies by state, by network or by hospital, we say that too, rather than averaging it into a national process that does not exist.
Figures describe what is in scope at launch, not what has been sold.
Confirm your address, then one email when the first bank opens. No pricing yet, and no date we would be willing to promise you.